Philip Berg News Conference at US Supreme Court - 10/30/08

Phil Berg discusses why Obama can't be president:



Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between “December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: “…If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.” Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen and Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai’i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama’s birth, but *after* age 16. It doesn’t matter *after* . In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship. At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18 in Hawai’i. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aformentioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Cizen parent. Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.

Here's another good explanation:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

In Courtroom Showdown, Bush Demands Amnesty for Spying Telecoms

The showdown continues with the amnesty for spying telecoms:

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/12/feds-eff-arguin.html


"Is there any precedent for this type of enactment that is analogous in all of these respects: retroactivity; immunity for constitutional violations; and delegation of broad discretion to the executive branch to determine whether to invoke the provision?," the judge asked.

Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law, says the immunity legislation, if upheld, "makes it possible to extend immunity to other areas of the law."

In other words, the professor and judge are basically saying the if this law is upheld then by setting this precedent the President and Congress can make anyone or anything above the law.

Theft by Deception

Are you liable for the income tax?

Part 1:



Part 2:



Part 3:



Part 4:



Part 5:



Part 6



Part 7:



Part 8:



Part 9:




Here's a little more on section 861:

Suzanna Gratia-Hupp: What the Second Amendment is REALLY For

She understands the real meaning of the Second Amendment:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4069761537893819675&p%20r=goog-sl

Here's her story:



Virginia Tech mass shooting and gun free zones:

Don't Talk to Cops

The 5th Amendment is a beautiful thing:

Part 1:


Part 2:

BUSTED: The Citizen's Guide to Surviving Police Encounters

Don't give up your rights:

Tennessee Constitution

Here's the Constitution for the State of Tennessee:

http://www.tncrimlaw.com/law/constit/