Philip Berg News Conference at US Supreme Court - 10/30/08

Phil Berg discusses why Obama can't be president:



Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between “December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: “…If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.” Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen and Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai’i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama’s birth, but *after* age 16. It doesn’t matter *after* . In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship. At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18 in Hawai’i. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aformentioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Cizen parent. Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.

Here's another good explanation:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

In Courtroom Showdown, Bush Demands Amnesty for Spying Telecoms

The showdown continues with the amnesty for spying telecoms:

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/12/feds-eff-arguin.html


"Is there any precedent for this type of enactment that is analogous in all of these respects: retroactivity; immunity for constitutional violations; and delegation of broad discretion to the executive branch to determine whether to invoke the provision?," the judge asked.

Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law, says the immunity legislation, if upheld, "makes it possible to extend immunity to other areas of the law."

In other words, the professor and judge are basically saying the if this law is upheld then by setting this precedent the President and Congress can make anyone or anything above the law.

Theft by Deception

Are you liable for the income tax?

Part 1:



Part 2:



Part 3:



Part 4:



Part 5:



Part 6



Part 7:



Part 8:



Part 9:




Here's a little more on section 861:

Suzanna Gratia-Hupp: What the Second Amendment is REALLY For

She understands the real meaning of the Second Amendment:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4069761537893819675&p%20r=goog-sl

Here's her story:



Virginia Tech mass shooting and gun free zones:

Don't Talk to Cops

The 5th Amendment is a beautiful thing:

Part 1:


Part 2:

BUSTED: The Citizen's Guide to Surviving Police Encounters

Don't give up your rights:

Tennessee Constitution

Here's the Constitution for the State of Tennessee:

http://www.tncrimlaw.com/law/constit/

Judicial Watch

This website promotes open and honest government:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/

Next president will reshape U.S. courts from top to bottom

The next president will select several Supreme Court judges:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20081001/pl_mcclatchy/3060709

Violation of the Federal Campaign Finance Laws

Do you still think that McCain will be your President if he is elected? Why did he attend a fundraiser in London with Rothschild?

http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Judicial-Watch-848337.html

AMERICAN DETENTION CENTER - 2004 RNC GULAG

Is this the kind of America that you want?

DNC Detention Camps Checked Out by We Are Change Colorado

Do you think that you can trust the police and the local government in your community?

World's Worst Prison Population

The U.S. has about 375,000 more people in prison than both India and China combined. However, the population of the U.S. is only 13% the size of the populations in India and China which has a combined population of about 2.2 billion. The United States has less than 5 percent of the world's population. But it has almost a quarter of the world's prisoners. How is that possible in a supposedly free nation?

http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/law/research/icps/worldbrief/wpb_stats.php?area=all&category=wb_poptotal

Also in 2004, nearly 7 million people were on probation, in jail or prison, or on parole at yearend 2004 -- 3.2% of all U.S. adult residents or 1 in every 31 adults. Is the US still a free nation?







Here's another article from the NY Times and Herald Tribune:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/us/28cnd-prison.html?incamp=article_popular_1

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/23/america/23prison.php


It used to be that Europeans came to the United States to study its prison systems. They came away impressed.

"In no country is criminal justice administered with more mildness than in the United States," Alexis de Tocqueville, who toured American penitentiaries in 1831, wrote in "Democracy in America."

No more.

"Far from serving as a model for the world, contemporary America is viewed with horror," James Whitman, a specialist in comparative law at Yale, wrote last year in Social Research.

"Certainly there are no European governments sending delegations to learn from us about how to manage prisons."

Is it possible that this trend could be related to voting? I found this comment at the Herald Tribune that I thought you might find interesting:

"If I may, there is an epilogue to my country’s obscenely large incarceration statistics, and that is voting rights. Many outside this country and even INSIDE this country don’t realize that a felony conviction means that you lose your ability to VOTE.
39 states even deny the right to vote while on parole.
29 states deny the right to vote even if the convicted felon is only serving probations.
And in 14 states this right to vote is lost for an entire LIFETIME, even if the conviction is fully served.
This amounts to nearly 4 MILLION adults in this country who do not have the right to vote at any given time. 1.4 MILLION of them have lost this right for their entire lifetime.
But this trend of voting disenfranchisement becomes even more troubling when you look at the demographics of which Americans are most effected.
1.4 million African American men, or 13 percent of the black adult male population, are currently disenfranchised. More than one-third (36 percent) of the total disenfranchised population are black men.
Given current rates of incarceration, three in ten of the next generation of black men will be disenfranchised at some point in their lifetime. In states with the most restrictive voting laws, 40 percent of African American men are likely to be disenfranchised for their entire lifetime."

Also, here's another perspective that you might find interesting:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/2/15/114022/882


Is this the correct way to address the problem with drugs as shown in this article?
http://www.drugpolicy.org/library/vliet2.cfm

Officer Jackboot Jones

Do you see Officer Jackboot Jones in your town on a regular basis:

DNA links man to anthrax mailings

CNN reports on new developments in the anthrax mailings case:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/03/anthrax.case/index.html

Police and Cameras

Jim Carey makes a good point about police and cameras:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do59qlLOK8A&feature=related

Red Beckman Seminar

What are your thoughts on this video? Does Red Beckman get it right?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5959251658237547562